Poll: Which general social networking site have you joined?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Facebook, MySpace,etc...

  1. #11
    Geek's Avatar
    Geek is offline Member Awards:
    Community Award
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    90

    Default New password-stealing virus targets Facebook

    Beware if you are a Facebook user. This phishing scam is spreading fast:

    BOSTON (Reuters) - Hackers have flooded the Internet with virus-tainted spam that targets Facebook's estimated 400 million users in an effort to steal banking passwords and gather other sensitive information.

    The emails tell recipients that the passwords on their Facebook accounts have been reset, urging them to click on an attachment to obtain new login credentials, according to anti-virus software maker McAfee Inc.

    If the attachment is opened, it downloads several types of malicious software, including a program that steals passwords, McAfee said on Wednesday.

    Hackers have long targeted Facebook users, sending them tainted messages via the social networking company's own internal email system. With this new attack, they are using regular Internet email to spread their malicious software.

    A Facebook spokesman said the company could not comment on the specific case, but pointed to a status update the company posted on its web site earlier on Wednesday warning users about the spoofed email and advising users to delete the email and to warn their friends.

    McAfee estimates that hackers sent out tens of millions of spam across Europe, the United States and Asia since the campaign began on Tuesday.

    Dave Marcus, McAfee's director of malware research and communications, said that he expects the hackers will succeed in infecting millions of computers.

    "With Facebook as your lure, you potentially have 400 million people that can click on the attachment. If you get 10 percent success, that's 40 million," he said.

    The email's subject line says "Facebook password reset confirmation customer support," according to Marcus.
    Credit: Reuters/Catherine Benson

  2. #12
    Geek's Avatar
    Geek is offline Member Awards:
    Community Award
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    90

    Default Facebook resuses panic button....

    Why would they not do this, I wonder? What's the real reason, you think, Facebook is not prepared to install a "panic button" system that allows children to flag up suspected online paedophiles. This article appeared in the British Telegraph newspaper

    Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, will meet with representatives of the social networking site today and demand to know why they have not adopted the device.

    The company faced criticism last week following the conviction of Peter Chapman, who raped and murdered 17-year-old Ashleigh Hall after posing on the site as a young man.

    Mr Johnson said he could not see "any good reason" why Facebook would not want to use the protection system, which has been adopted by hundreds of other websites including Bebo and MSN Live Messenger.

    It was introduced by the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) in 2006 and allows children who fear they are being targeted by an paedophile to receive expert advice at the click of a button and report complaints to the police.

    Facebook has argued it has its own warning system, and that including the 'ClickCEOP' button could be confusing.

    It has also insisted its staff would alert the police if a child complained of being groomed.

    Jim Gamble, Ceop chief executive, has said Facebook's refusal to implement the panic button was "just not good enough" and their arguments do not "hold water".

    A Home Office spokesperson said: "The meeting is at the request of the Home Secretary to better understand the reasons why Facebook currently have not introduced the Child Exploitation and Online Protection (CEOP) Centre report abuse button.

    "Hundreds of websites sites have already signed up to CEOP's report abuse button that enables young people to seek help if they think they are in danger online.

    "We don't see any good reason why major sites wouldn't want to offer the same option to help protect younger users which is why we want Facebook and other providers of sites who haven't signed up yet to do so."

    A spokesman for Facebook said the company was 'committed to maintaining the highest levels of protection' for users.

    "We regularly work with national law enforcement organisations and the world’s leading experts in online protection to ensure we provide the best possible security for anyone that uses the site," the spokesman added.

    "We actively seek-out opportunities to innovate and improve our reporting systems all the time. We look forward to discussing our thoughts on this with the Home Secretary."

  3. #13
    Geek's Avatar
    Geek is offline Member Awards:
    Community Award
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    90

    Default How Facebook takes over children's lives.

    This article raises some interesting issues about social networking sites, and it underlines that parents should and must be interested in what their children are up to online. I'm a geek and believe in the advancement that technologies such as social networking sites bring to the world but some if this is frightening stuff:

    THERE is a new distraction in the classroom these days and it is far more insidious than the kind of thing schoolchildren have always got up to. As parents fret about what their youngsters are doing for hours on end, shut away in their bedrooms on their computers, it emerges that teachers, too, are *beginning to feel powerless in the face of the lure of social networking sites like Facebook.

    Because it isn’t just at home that youngsters are “disappearing” into their virtual other-worlds.

    At school they cannot resist accessing their favourite networking sites even during lessons and teachers are finding it increasingly difficult to stop them, out-smarted as they often are by tech-savvy pupils who simply log on using their mobile phones which have internet access.

    While many head teachers hoped to prevent pupils getting on to sites like Facebook, Bebo and MySpace by disabling their school’s *computer networks to prevent internet *access, they hadn’t reckoned on today’s sophisticated mobiles. At least one head says this has forced him to lift his ban altogether.

    With GCSE and A-level exams just weeks away, many youngsters cannot concentrate on their swotting when the enticement of the internet calls and it is so easy to log on, chill out and “chat” to friends from Southampton to Shanghai, from Halifax to Honolulu.

    The latest concern about what online networking is doing to the Facebook Generation comes at the end of a week in which the site has been named in two high-profile murders.

    First, serial sex offender Peter Chapman was jailed for life for kidnapping, raping and murdering 17-year-old Ashleigh Hall.

    He lured the gullible teenager to her death after grooming her by posing as a handsome 19-year-old boy on Facebook.

    Then came the case of Paul Bristol, 25, who saw photographs of his former girlfriend posted on *Facebook and took his bloody revenge. He was convicted of murder at the Old Bailey.

    Earlier this month an inquest heard of the suicide of public schoolgirl Holly Grogan, 15, who plunged to her death from a bridge over a dual carriageway after being bullied by schoolgirls who had taunted her on Facebook.

    Cyber-bullying is far from uncommon, nor is “cyber-racism” where unsuspecting youngsters are being recruited by the political Far Right.

    Given such enticements, it is easy to explain the astonishing rise in popularity of Facebook, Bebo, MySpace and others in the short time they have existed, particularly among the young.

    Just six years old, Facebook is by far the world’s most popular social networking site. It has risen from a facility for Ivy League students in the United States to a global phenomenon with about 400million users.

    This enormous surge in popularity has propelled its 25-year-old founder Mark Zuckerberg from college student to the chief executive of an organisation that is currently valued at £7.6billion and which is on course to generate revenues of about £700million this year. In the UK it has more than 23million users, 5.3million of whom are teenagers.

    Astonishingly, 96.4 per cent of all 13 to 32- year-olds have a Facebook profile.

    There is also a disturbingly high number of under-13s illicitly accessing social networking sites, with a recent poll suggesting one in four – or 750,000 – eight to 12-year-olds in Britain evade the 13 and over age restrictions.

    It is becoming typical of the internet age that such phenomena spring up at a pace that would once have been thought impossible. The speed at which Facebook has gripped the world has meant that concerns over the dangers it might pose have lagged behind.

    Girls seem to be “permanently connected” to sites like Facebook and Bebo, president of the Girls’ Schools Association Jill Berry warned recently.

    The issue now tops the list of parents’ worries by some way, she told the association’s annual conference. But one area of concern which has been less well documented is over the longer term psychological effects of the enormous rise of online social networking on the young and impressionable.

    How will teenagers who believe they have the world at their fingertips, even though they are not even leaving their own bedrooms, cope when their turn comes to take their place in the real world?

    Some argue that these youngsters are chained by their addiction to the social networking sites which offer a seductive deception that could be profoundly psychologically damaging.

    Far from offering freedom they are, in reality, an online prison where teenage users are isolated and not engaging in the kind of real-world social interaction they need.

    Archbishop Vincent Nichols, head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, has made public his fears about the role online social networking is playing in the fragmentation of modern society.

    He has warned the sites are leading teenagers to build “transient relationships” which leave them unable to cope when their social networks collapse. He said the internet and mobile phones were “dehumanising” community life.

    “I think there’s a worry that an excessive use or an almost exclusive use of text and e-mails means that as a society we’re losing some of the ability to build interpersonal communication that’s necessary for living together and building a community.

    “We’re losing social skills, the human interaction skills, how to read a person’s mood, to read their body language, how to be patient until the moment is right to make or press a point.

    “Too much exclusive use of electronic information dehumanises what is a very, very important part of community life and living together.

    “Facebook and MySpace might contribute towards communities but I’m wary about it. It’s not rounded communication so it won’t build a rounded community.

    “If we mean by community a genuine growing together and a mutual sharing in an interest that is of some significance then it needs more than Facebook.

    “Among young people often a key factor in them committing suicide is the trauma of transient relationships.

    “They throw themselves into a friendship or network of friendships, then it collapses and they’re desolate.

    “It’s an all or nothing syndrome that you have to have in an attempt to shore up an identity; a collection of friends about whom you can talk and even boast.

    “But friendship is not a commodity, friendship is something that is hard work and enduring when it’s right.”

    AT the heart of the debate about social networking is the conflict between community and privacy. Mark Zuckerberg recently announced that young people no longer have the expectation of privacy, yet others argue that the appeal of Facebook is that it offers them a sense of a private space.

    Social networking expert Danah Boyd said: “Kids have always cared about privacy, it’s just that their notions of privacy look very different than adult notions.

    “As adults, by and large, we think of the home as a very private space. For young people it’s not a private space. They have no control over who comes in and out of their room, or who comes in and out of their house. As a result, the online world feels more private because it feels like it has more control.”

    Yet many people worry that the feeling of being in control of an online existence is an illusion and one fraught with danger both from cyber-criminals in the short term and from those psychological demons spawned by our internet obsession that we can at present only guess at.
    Last edited by Geek; 20th March 2010 at 08:50 PM.

  4. #14
    Galaxy's Avatar
    Galaxy is offline Member Awards:
    User with most referrers
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    74

    Default Re: Facebook, MySpace,etc...

    I was so happy to come across this column. I closed my Facebook account recently and don't regret it for a minute. Actually, a weight has lifted rom my shoulders. There is so much shallowness and pretence going on on Facebook. ithink it completely depoersonalises relationships and actually undermines real-world, real-life friendships. I couldn't agree more with the lady:

    I’m free of Facebook — and it feels so good to talk
    Sarah Standing

    Status update and tweet: I'm no longer a member of the cyber chattering classes. I have officially left the cult. I am a free woman.

    After two indolent years spent greedily gathering an obscene volume of friends (892) and followers (156) I have deactivated both my Facebook and Twitter accounts. I don't feel remotely friendless over my impetuous act of mass social genocide, and for that I must be grateful — especially in light of a recent survey by psychologists at the University of Greenwich. In their quest to find a formula that ensured contented, long lives, they found humble friendships gave the most happiness, raising satisfaction levels by 30 per cent.

    I'm assuming the psychologists were referring to that old-fashioned, interactive act that is in danger of becoming almost obsolete: the face-to-face, one-on-one relationship. Sadly, I think I belong to a generation that has embraced quantity over quality communication. Technology has given us an orgiastic, cavalier attitude towards keeping in touch. It's good to talk but we're now so busy emailing, tweeting, sending BBMs, blogging and texting that there's precious little left over to actually say when confronted with a real-time encounter with a friend. We've already read the sound bites and know the mundane minutiae of one another's lives.

    We live in a culture than yearns to bestow not just Andy Warhol's 15 minutes of fame but a rolling 24/7 soundtrack. Whether it was being bombarded (and bored) by “too much information”, it suddenly all got too much for me.

    One morning last week I logged on, pressed Facebook news update and had an epiphany. I decided that it was high time for me to downsize technically and get back a (real) life. My life.

    As a child my parents warned me against the perils of talking to strangers, and yet here I was blithely having a pointless micro-conversation with a random South African I'd accepted as my friend for no other reason than the fact that he'd heartily agreed with something I'd once written in a column.

    It was only 7am, yet already I'd been poked by Dan; given the thumbs up to a schoolfriend's revelation — sent via her BlackBerry — that she'd just tried a cup of Starbucks' new flat white coffee; seen that my old cleaner was terminally hacked off with her teenage son getting in late last night; and that the nice lady who once gave me a bikini wax in New York was heading to Mexico for the weekend.

    I was tapping out two simultaneous online conversations — one with my daughter downstairs in her bedroom, the other with a PR who'd spotted that I was available to chat and seized the moment to extol the virtues of a non- surgical facelift. I'd checked out my horoscope, read an article from The Huffington Post, seen that Steve was no longer in a relationship, noted that Andrew had befriended Big Dave, and was about to embark on the onerous task of tending to my vast Farmville estate (acres of pumpkins, sunflowers and asparagus to be harvested, chickens to be fed, cats to be stroked, cherry trees to denude) when something — something other than my mouse — clicked.

    Enough. I decided to stop wasting my time, energy and brainpower cyber-talking to virtual strangers. It's back to basics for me. I picked up the house telephone and phoned a friend.
    Is it not careless to become too local when there are four hundred billion stars in our galaxy alone - Archie R. Ammons

  5. #15
    Geek's Avatar
    Geek is offline Member Awards:
    Community Award
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: Facebook, MySpace,etc...

    Hey Galaxy - you're not the only one! Read this and wonder:

    Privacy issues? Google engineers leaving Facebook in droves

    Well I bet they didn’t quite expect that. In the wake of Facebook’s F8 conference this week, where it apparently bid to become the new Sheriff of the Internet, Facebook’s plans to effectively put ’social’ into the very structure of the Web has a few people a little concerned.

    The main issue is that there are concerns that Facebook, by default, now opts you in to allowing third party sites like Yelp to ‘personalise’ your experience, and there are questions about how much information is given away.

    The result is that lots of geeks are considering leaving Facebook, and perhaps even more interestingly, veritable droves of Google software engineers are among them. This includes Matt Cutts, head of the webspam team at Google (see below) who has not technically left, but has deactivated his Facebook account.

    Admittedly, there’s probably not a lot of love lost between Facebook and Google right now, but it is certainly fascinating to watch these Facebook departures from people who are early adopters, and deeply savvy about the Web.

    UK-based Buzz search engine Buzzzy has picked the following up, and we reproduce some examples of this mass exodus below.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Facebook, MySpace,etc...-picture-43.jpg   Facebook, MySpace,etc...-picture-44.jpg   Facebook, MySpace,etc...-picture-45.jpg   Facebook, MySpace,etc...-picture-46.jpg   Facebook, MySpace,etc...-picture-47.jpg  

    Last edited by Geek; 6th May 2010 at 12:46 PM.

  6. #16
    Mie1's Avatar
    Mie1 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Windhoek
    Posts
    885

    Default Re: Facebook, MySpace,etc...

    Galaxy,
    Geek,

    Maybe your posting(s) just accelerated the idea somewhat, but I have seriously mulled the idea of deactivating FB. I have made some good contacts and that is important in my job, but I am so thorough sick and tired of seeing entry after entry of "so and so is now friends with abc"

    Let's see what happens

  7. #17
    TheVoid is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Windhoek
    Posts
    6

    Default Re: Announcements soon!

    i dont like these social networks much... :-\


  8. #18
    Matthew Guest

    Default Re: Facebook, MySpace,etc...

    Bye bye Facebook now my account is closed. Been thinking some time that FB is a closed site, too super-superficial and took over my life for some time. Now I am free!! My friends? They are real and I see them in real life. I'm not the only one? http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/18/te...ation-ireport/

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Connect to Facebook
    By Galaxy in forum The Noticeboard
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th November 2009, 11:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •