Re: Banning books ..........
Complete agree, Mie1 - banning things is counterproductive. What a fascinating read your post has been. It kind of make me want to read so many books I have not - admittedly - been aware of.
Just to explain (from Wikipedia):
In the United States, many books have been challenged by a variety of groups and agencies in order to prevent a particular work from being read by the general public. In recent years, it has become more common for those challenging the availability of a book to do so on a local level, targeting public libraries and school libraries. In fact, many communities have a formal process by which a citizen can challenge the public availability of a work. That a book's availability has been challenged does not automatically indicate that it has been removed from library shelves in even one community.
So when we read challenged here it does not necessarily mean the book has been banned. It does mean these books have been commonly targeted for censorship....
I suppose what this also shows is that freedom of speech has to be defended each and every day. There are as many people in the United States who are intolerant as they are in any other part of the world. They will try their level best to suppress the right of free people to speak and write freely.
It is the responsibility and obligation of all freedom-loving people around the world to stand up in the face of attempts to suppress the free flow of free thoughts and to say clearly, with one voice: Think for yourself and let others enjoy the privilege to do so, too (Voltaire).
"Nothing is complete and thus nothing is exempt from criticism." - James Luther Adams:
Bookmarks