Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: NSHR vs Kanana Hishoono

  1. #1
    Oneword's Avatar
    Currently Offline Senior Member Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Erehwon
    Posts
    980
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default NSHR vs Kanana Hishoono

    The following is being republished verbatim! Thus, caveat lector!

    1. My name is Phil Iyaloo ya Nangoloh. I describe myself inter alia as a Namibian human rights activist and a political commentator cum analyst as well as a researcher. The Namibian newspaper’s edition of September 24 2007 prominently featured a story about certain offensive and unbecoming utterances which reportedly came out of the mount of the Secretary of Swapo Party Elder’s Council (SPEC), uncle Kanana Matias Gideon Hishoono, about my person and others.

    2. That newspaper story was entitled Swapo Elders to focus on NSHR. In accordance with that story, Hishoono addressed the fourth SPEC congress of between 400 and 500 delegates and he spoke under the theme Elders for Peace, Unity and Social Progress. Topping the SPEC agenda was the perceived “threats to peace” by a “maliciously fabricated propaganda campaign” against [the Swapo Party] and its leadership by “reactionary opportunistic elements led by a certain Mr. Phil ya Nangoloh and his cohorts in the National Society for Human Rights”.

    3. What immediately came to my mind following the above utterances by uncle Hishoono was the fact that I had known from oral history that Matias Gideon Hishoono, whom I identify as the same person as Kanana Hishoono, was an informer for the apartheid regime during the liberation struggle for Namibian independence. I am saying that he was an informer of the apartheid regime because Hishoono was a State witness during the 1967-1968 Pretoria High Treason Trial against several Namibian patriots. These patriots, led by the legendary Herman Tovio ya Toivo, were rounded up by SA security forces in the then Ovamboland and elsewhere and were subsequently taken to Pretoria where held and tortured before they faced high treason charges under the notorious the Suppression of Communism Act 1950 (Act 44 of 1950) and the Terrorism Act 1967 (Act 83 of 1967).

    4. Hishoono made the aforementioned remarks against my person and those of my NSHR comrades following our still pending petition before the International Criminal Court (ICC) that this Court investigate the former Namibian President and three others ratione personae for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed under their supervision before and after Namibian independence.

    5. I took a very serious offense at what Hishoono had said both about my person and my NSHR colleagues. However, at the time I did not have enough documentary proof to mount a counter attack and expose Matias Gideon “Kanana” Hishoono for the fact that he was a quisling for the SA apartheid regime. Respectfully though, I now would like uncle “Kanana” Hishoono to sallow his baseless accusations that either myself and or any of my NSHR colleagues had waged “maliciously fabricated propaganda campaign” against the Swapo Party and its leadership and or that either myself and or my NSHR colleagues were and or are “reactionary opportunistic elements”.

    6. Now I am ready for the long-awaited counter offensive. Here it goes: Documentary evidence in my possession reveals that Matias Gideon Hishoono had been a State witness against Herman Toivo ya Toivo at the Pretoria High Treason Trial between October 3 1967 and October 6 1967 and that, as a result of inter alia Hishoono’s voluntary and enthusiastic treasonous testimony under oath, uncle Toivo ya Toivo had to receive a long-term prison sentence of 27 years on Robben Island in or around 1968! Hello? Is uncle Hishoono there, next to you? If he is, please ask him if he still remembers his reactionary testimony against ya Toivo in particular. Please also ask him who real “reactionary opportunistic element” was.

    7. Please never throw stones if you live in a glass house!

  2. #2
    Comrade007's Avatar
    Currently Offline Aluta Continua!
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Windhoek
    Posts
    544

    Default Re: NSHR vs Kanana Hishoono

    Aaah, Namibian politics!! What will become of uncle Hishoono now, I wonder?
    "Nothing is complete and thus nothing is exempt from criticism." - James Luther Adams:

  3. #3
    Oneword's Avatar
    Currently Offline Senior Member Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Erehwon
    Posts
    980
    Blog Entries
    17

    Default NSHR vs Kanana Hishoono Part 2

    1. Once again, my name is Phil Iyaloo ya Nangoloh and I describe myself inter alia a Namibian human rights activist, a political commentator and analyst as well as a researcher. Some three days ago I circulated an e-mail about inter alia the documentary evidence now in my possession showing that the Secretary of the Swapo Party’s Elder Council (SPEC), Uncle Matias Gideon Kanana Hishoono, has been a State witness for the apartheid regime before Namibian independence.

    2. The 46-page bilingual (Afrikaans-English) document is a transcript of the oral testimony, which Uncle Hishoono gave under oath and under the penalty of perjury, at the 1967-1968 Pretoria High Treason Trial. He gave the testimony against particularly Swapo founder, Uncle Herman ya Toivo, in support of the testimonies given by, among others, South African security and intelligence officers, such as Major Theunis “Rooi Rus” Swanepoel and his cohort Lieutenant Petrus Albertus Ferreira. Both men are now late.

    3. Yesterday at ya Toivo’s birthday reception party, Uncle Hishoono made several remarks about to the past, including ya Toivo’s 17-years incarceration on Robben Island. However, Uncle Hishoono conveniently failed to say a single word of remorse for his treasonous testimony in 1967. What I found even more revolting and or insincere is the fact that Uncle Hishoono missed a golden opportunity to publicly apologize to Uncle ya Toivo.

    4. Now, my main reason for bringing up the issue of Uncle Hishoono’s pro-apartheid testimony is the fact that during 2007 he had the audacity to brand me and my other NSHR colleagues as inter alia “reactionary and opportunistic elements”. In so doing he created a false impression in the eyes of the general public that we at NSHR are doing or we have done something treasonous. In my opinion, Uncle Hishoono made these remarks merely in order to assassinate our characters and thereby perhaps endanger our personal security as well as in order to attack the constitutionally guaranteed democratic discourse in this country. Uncle Hishoono made these offensive and fallacious remarks against us apparently as retribution for our petition to the International Criminal Court.

    Remember that on or around December 8 2006 we requested ICC to investigate charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity against, among others, the former Swapo and Namibian president? Although we did not at all violate any law by submitting such a petition nor did we threaten the public peace and or security of this country in so doing, we, nonetheless, provoked a wrath from Uncle Hishoono. Our petition was and is perfectly legal and constitutional!

    5. Democracy will best be served in our country when and if all of us refrain from name-calling and dirty tricks. It is, however, very sad that those who have been in the fore front working hand in glove with the apartheid regime are today (i.e. after Namibian independence) also the very same people who are in the fore front of calling others “reactionary”, “puppets” and so on.

    6. Never ever throw stones if you live in a glass house!

    nshr

Similar Threads

  1. Fight Against Corruption a Joke, Says NSHR
    By NewsTracker in forum Namibia News Headlines
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st July 2009, 10:14 PM
  2. NSHR Petition to Pres. Pohamba
    By Oneword in forum News & Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 5th June 2008, 03:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •