Yea, then some Namibians no longer need to keep their other passport at a certain embassy
The Prime Minister is proposing a revised citizenship law. I disagree completely!
The most wonderful moment of my life must be the day I got married. I was standing in the front of the church and looked down the aisle at the woman, (already the mother of my child) being brought forward by her father. This was the person who intended to stay with for the rest of my life. Unfortunately, we do not always appreciate what we have and ten years later I was a divorced man. (For the record, I accept full blame for the failure of the marriage. I have always had a clear vision of what I wanted from my life, namely a diplomat, and unfortunately this meant that a wife would have to give up her career.)
This story is not about marriage though; it rather has to do with the problems created by the government for our union. You see the woman I married was born in Upington, South Africa.
Now our constitution (PRESENTLY) states in Article 4 Acquisition and Loss of Citizenship:
(3) The following persons shall be citizens of Namibia by marriage:
(a) those who are not Namibian citizens under Sub-Article (1) or (2) hereof
and who:
(aa) in good faith marry a Namibian citizen or, prior to the coming into
force of this Constitution, in good faith married a person who would
have qualified for Namibian citizenship if this Constitution had been
in force; and
(bb) subsequent to such marriage have ordinarily resided in Namibia as
the spouse of such person for a period of not less than two (2)
years; and
(cc) apply to become citizens of Namibia;
If the amendment goes through my ex-wife would be denied citizenship because we were not ten years in Namibia - I represented Namibia for two years in France.
Now, if I met a person from another country would I give up my citizenship to be with them?
My proposal is that this issue has to be relaxed rather then made more difficult. I propose Namibia allows Dual Citizenship.
Yea, then some Namibians no longer need to keep their other passport at a certain embassy
The only thing that will lose if people who hold dual citizenships are forced to make a choice is our country, because I think it is natural for people to let the chips fall where the risk is perceived to be lower.
In today's world without borders, and considering the small number of people who hold dual citizenships, it seems a waste of time to me to entertain the thought of changing the Constitution. It makes for populist politics, of course, so close to an election. But how about rather concentratimng on tackling the real challenges our nation faces, amongst them giving thousands of people valid birth certificates, driver's licenses, passports, ID cards..... another case of wrong focus and priorities if you ask me.
Last edited by Comrade007; 18th April 2009 at 03:08 PM.
"Nothing is complete and thus nothing is exempt from criticism." - James Luther Adams:
USA allow you to be a dual passport holder but EU countries like Swiss, Germany, Norway, Sweden, ect. does not allow dual passports or citizenship for the matter.
Namibia as seen by foreigners, forgive me patriots if it hurts, but they see Namibia as a zoo ... some say Opuwo is the cracker ... stone aged people ... that brutally beat the front teeth out with a hammer like tool, these foreigners mentioned.
Mayority of the people live on wurms for nutrition and change the name to "land scrimps" and "fein Kost".
People believe these crap![]()
pangkas
Hi pangkas,
althought it is not the topic of this thread, but just to clarify. Switerzland and Norway are not part of the European Union (EU) and Germany made the dual citizenshop law easier some 2 years ago. Under specific circumstances Germans can keep their German citizenship while getting a second one and every child born with at least one German parent can keep both citizenships and do not have to decide any longer at their 18th birthday.
Regards
Christian
"Through the EEA Agreement, Norway and Iceland have already taken up 80 per cent of the acquis communautaire and Switzerland is taking an increasing amount of EU legislation.
For these three countries the EU remains an unavoidable player. This publication examines the performance of EFTA and EEA Agreement. As the EU develops, those institutions under which they operate become ever more inadequate, endangering democratic legitimacy." as Wallis sees it. Almost a three year old document.
Legaslation in Europe are fast, ever growing and to the point, even if it comes with risks, but these people take massive risks and in Africa, it take ages for nothing to happen.
Well German law is fast, take a look at this :
Under specific circumstances Germans can keep their German citizenship while getting a second one and every child born with at least one German parent can keep both citizenships and do not have to decide any longer at their 18th birthday.
Regards
Christian
Bundesverwaltungsgericht schafft Klarheit
EU-Ausländer können bei der Einbürgerung in Deutschland ihre Staatsangehörigkeit behalten, wenn auch ihr Land bei der Einbürgerung von Deutschen die doppelte Staatsangehörigkeit hinnimmt. Mit diesem Urteil entschied der 1. Revisionssenat des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts in Leipzig im April 2004 zu Gunsten eines griechischen Psychotherapeuten. Der Kläger hatte in Bayern seine Einbürgerung beantragt, wollte aber auch seine griechische Staatsangehörigkeit nicht aufgeben (BVerwG 1 C 13.03).
Many things have changed since.
The German law reform as stipulated in BVerwG " Mit dem Gesetz zur Reform des Staatsangehörigkeitsrechts vom 15. Juli 1999 hat der Bundesgesetzgeber in § 87 Abs. 2 des Ausländergesetzes (AuslG), im Hinblick auf das Ziel der fortschreitenden europäischen Integration eine spezielle Regelung getroffen: Bei Unionsbürgern wird nicht verlangt, dass sie vor der Einbürgerung in Deutschland ihre bisherige Staatsangehörigkeit aufgeben, wenn der andere EU-Mitgliedsstaat im Gegenzug bei Einbürgerungen von Deutschen ebenso verfährt.
We can always debate issues with open-endings such as above-mentioned.
Kind regards
pangkas
Last edited by pangkas; 20th April 2009 at 05:09 PM.
pangkas
Just reading through this again begs the question, have we all understood the constitution is going to be changed anyway -after all 2/3 majority - why not add somethings that actually make a difference to a man/woman on the street?
Agree with Comrade. Seems easy to do and not really solving big problems. Catching small fish as they say.
The same issues is being discussed and deliberated in Zimbabwe at the moment, as this article in the government-owned The Herald indicates:
South Africa.pZimbabwe: Allow Dual Citizenship - Mutambara
Harare — Zimbabweans abroad should be allowed to have dual citizenship so that they can plough back into the country and help market the country as a safe tourist destination, Deputy Prime Minister Prof Arthur Mutambara has said. Prof Mutambara said some Zimbabweans who left the country years ago had families in foreign countries and their children had become citizens by birth but were still Zimbabweans.
"We need to change our laws. Let's not force people to choose against their country. You cannot have all your citizens in the country even if the country does well there are some Zimbabweans who will remain in Japan or England.
"Let's use our people outside to attract foreign investment and invite tourists to Zimbabwe," he said.
Dep PM Mutambara, who was addressing delegates at the just-ended youth conference, said it was crucial to embrace those in the Diaspora so that they can help in the country's economic recovery programme.
"Let us also embrace our Zimbabweans outside who are doing good like Strive Masiyiwa and Mutumwa Mawere so that they can also contribute to nation building. "What has happened is history, yes bad things happen, let us now unite and stop victimising each other. Let us not throw away the baby with the (bath) water. We should sit down as brothers and re-engage," he said.
Dep PM Mutambara said in the long run Zimbabwe would not survive through handouts but by investments and public/private partnerships. It is estimated that at least three million Zimbabweans live outside the country as economic refugees with most of them in United Kingdom, Australia and
What are you thinking, why did we leave our countries of birth?Originally Posted by [B
Use the gray matter between your ears for once, BEFORE YOU POST YOUR CRAP; Africans and many other under developed back-ward third world countries citizens simply leave THEIR countries because of the following reasons.:"Let's use our people outside to attract foreign investment and invite tourists to Zimbabwe," he said.
political oppression
threatening and destroying of our basic freedoms and our way of lifeconflicts that endangered human life
no democracey or civil liberty
fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism
corruption and ethnic strife
poor education
poverty
The list is ongoing ...
and for your information ... such conditions lead to terrorism, believe me or not.
This is easier said then done. This conditions have nothing to do with dual citizenship."Let us also embrace our Zimbabweans outside who are doing good like Strive Masiyiwa and Mutumwa Mawere so that they can also contribute to nation building. "What has happened is history, yes bad things happen, let us now unite and stop victimising each other. Let us not throw away the baby with the (bath) water. We should sit down as brothers and re-engage," he said.
Last edited by pangkas; 27th April 2009 at 07:28 AM.
pangkas
Bookmarks